Keywords
Non-governmental organizations
How to Cite
Abstract
This study reports the results of the research project "Organizational learning in civil society organizations that implement programs based on responsible social innovation in the city of La Plata and its area of influence", which was carried out at the Faculty of Economic Sciences of the National University of La Plata (FCE UNLP). The study presents the organizational learning described by the civil society organizations of the city of La Plata and by the faculty chairs that provided technical assistance during this collaboration.
References
Argyris, Ch. (1999). Conocimieno para la acción. Una guía para superar los obstáculos del cambio en la organización. Buenos Aires- Barcelona-Mexico: Granica.
Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas. AECA. (2011). Aprendizaje Organizativo. (21). España.
Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2006a). The challenges and Prospects of learning-in-practice. Paper presented at the Conference at the University of Warwick, Coventry.
Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2006b). The relationship between individual and organizational learning. New evidence from managerial learning practices. Management learning, 37 (4), 455-473. doi:10.1177/1350507606070220. Recuperado de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350507606070220
Antonello, S y Godoy, A. (2010). A encruzilhada da aprendizagem organizacional: uma visão multiparadigmática Revista de Administração Contemporânea,14,(2,) 310-332. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552010000200008
Brandi, U. y E., Bente. (2011). Organizational learning viewed from a social learning perspective. En Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (Eds.). (2011).Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. John Wiley & Sons.
Bustinza, O. F., Molina, L. M., & Arias-Aranda, D. (2010). Organizational learning and performance: Relationship between the dynamic and the operational capabilities of the firm. African Journal of Business Management, 4(18), 4067-4078. Recuperado de https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/33179/Bustinza_OrganizationalLearning.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Di Maggio, Paul J. y Walter W. Powell (1999). Retorno a la jaula de hierro: el isomorfismo institucional y la racionalidad colectiva en los campos organizacionales. En El nuevo institucionalismo en el análisis organizacional, (pp.104-195) México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
European Commission. (2013). Powering European Public Sector Innovation: Towards A New Architecture .Report of the Expert Group on Public Sector Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/content/powering-european-public-sector-innovation-towards-new-architecture-report-expert-group
Autora, yAutora (2017). Gestionando el aprendizaje en organizaciones que educan en el marco de una innovación social en el campo de atención sociosanitaria. RELAPAE (7), pp 81-95. ISSN 2408-4573 Recuperado de http://revistasuntref.com.ar/index.php/relapae/article/view/26/66
Autora (2007). Organizaciones voluntarias de personas mayores: entre la exclusión y la inclusión social. Tesis de doctorado, Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recuperado de http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/1279
Forni, P. (2002). Las Redes Inter-Organizacionales y sus implicancias en el desarrollo de las Organizaciones Comunitarias de los Pobres y Excluidos. Primer Congreso Nacional de Políticas Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes – Asociación Argentina de Políticas Sociales. Bernal, Quilmes, Argentina, 30- 1/MAY/2002 . Recuperado de https://racimo.usal.edu.ar/95/1/Forni4.pdf
Forni, P., & Lucimeire, V. L. (2006). El desarrollo y legitimación de las organizaciones del tercer sector en la Argentina. Hacia la definición de un isomorfismo periférico. Sociologias, 16, 216-249. Recuperado de https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1517-45222006000200009&script=sci_arttext
Gerometta, J., Haussermann, H., & Longo, G. (2005). Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2007-2021. Recuperado de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00420980500279851
Gore, E. (2003). Conocimiento colectivo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Granica.
Gore, E., & Mazzini, M. (2010). Hacer visible lo invisible. Buenos Aires: Granica.
Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 7, 9-31. Recuperado de https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/7944
Landaeta, R. P. (2003). Gestión del conocimiento: una visión integradora del aprendizaje organizacional. Revista de investigación en Gestión de la Innovación y Tecnología.Conocimiento e Innovación(18) 52-58. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jesus_Tejedor/publication/28063582_Comparacion_de_los_sistemas_de_ciencia_y_tecnologia_existentes_en_Espana/links/552690e10cf2628d5afedabb/Comparacion-de-los-sistemas-de-ciencia-y-tecnologia-existentes-en-Espana.pdf#page=52.
Liebler, C., & Ferri, M. (2004). NGO networks: building capacity in a changing world. Report from a study supported by the USAID Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance. Washington, DC: USAID, Office of Private and Voluntary Cooperation. Recuperado de http://wikiciv.org.rs/images/9/9a/NGO_Networks.pdf
Moulaert, F. & Sekia, F. (2003) Territorial innovation models: A critical survey, Regional Studies, 37, pp. 289–302. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Moulaert/publication/24087717_Territorial_Innovation_Models_A_Critical_Survey/links/0912f50c5196d963e2000000.pdf
Perlo, C. (2011). Procesos de cambio colectivo, nuevos marcos de comprensión para aprender el holomovimiento. Enl@ce: Revista venezolana de Informacion, Tecnología y Conocimiento., 81-96. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/823/82317684006.pdf
Rodríguez, A. M. E., & Cedeño, B. E. (2012). La innovación entre dos manos: la invisible del mercado y la visible del Estado. TRILOGÍA. Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad 6, 13-30. https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/trilogia/article/view/33
Suárez F. (1995). Debilidades de las ONG. Revista Enoikos, (3) 9, 45-53.
Senge, P. (2005). La Quinta Disciplina. Cómo impulsar el aprendizaje en la organización inteligente. Barcelona: Granica.
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. New York: Routledge.
Sulbrandt, J.;Navarrete, N. y Piergentilli, N. (2007). Formas sociales que facilitan la entrega de servicios sociales. En Cortázar Velarde J.C. (editor) Entre el diseño y la evaluación: el papel crucial de la implementación de los programas sociales (págs. 119-165). Washington: IADB. Recuperado de https://publications.iadb.org/es/publicacion/14195/entre-el-diseno-y-la-evaluacion-el-papel-crucial-de-la-implementacion-de-los
Vera, D., Crossan, M., & Apaydin, M. (2011). A framework for integrating organizational learning, knowledge, capabilities, and absorptive capacity. En Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (págs. 153-180.).
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization 7(2), 225–246. Recuperado de https://www.psycholosphere.com/Communities%20of%20Practice%20&%20Social%20Learning%20Systems%20by%20Wenger%202000.pdf
International Journal of Organizations is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms”. Therefore, everyone who sends a manuscript is explicitly accepting this publication and edition cession. In the same way, he/she is authorizing International Journal of Organizations to include his/her work in a journal’s issue for its distribution and sale. The cession allows International Journal of Organizations to publish the work in a maximum period of two years.
With the aim of favouring the diffusion of knowledge, International Journal of Organizations joins the Open Access journal movement (DOAJ), and delivers all its contents to different repositories under this protocol; therefore, sending a manuscript to the journal also entails the explicit acceptation by its author/s of this distribution method.