Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the concerns of major Spanish companies in relation to Occupational Welfare, how these are reflected in their sustainability reports, and how corporate values translate into implementing Corporate Social Responsibility. Occupational Welfare has become a key concept in business ethics, as it brings together a set of essential provisions to address both the "old risks" and the "new risks" typical of complex and competitive societies. We carried out qualitative research on forty-two sustainability reports published in 2019 by the companies that make up the IBEX-35 stock exchange index, along with another seven that have among the largest workforces. The results allow us to relate Occupational Welfare and the areas where it applies to the management of Corporate Social Responsibility in aspects such as working conditions, occupational health, work-life balance, and continuing training.
References
Alonso-Almeida, M., Llach, J., and Marimon, F. (2014). A closer look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1318
Ancos, H. (2019). Las empresas españolas como motores del desarrollo sostenible. Documentos de Trabajo 12/2019. Fundación Carolina, Madrid. https://doi.org/10.33960/issn-e.1885-9119.DT12
Aƫtig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., and Suh, J. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Ratings. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1714-2
Behnam, M., and MacLean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112113
Blanco Prieto, A. (2010). Las aportaciones de la sociología española a la responsabilidad social empresarial. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 68 (3), 577-602. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2008.01.30
Blanco Prieto, A. and Alonso-Domínguez, A. (2020). Regulación del bienestar ocupacional: entre la legislación y la responsabilidad social empresarial. Revista Española de Sociología, 29 (2), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.20
Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26 (7), 1036-1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., and Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009
Brunsdon, E., and May, M. (2007). Occupational Welfare. In M. Powell (ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare (pp.149-176). Bristol: Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89b4m.13
Castiñeira, A., Curtó, F., Gummà, E.; Nadal, I., Ortega, E., and Rovira, A. (2019). La contribución de las empresas españolas a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (2º informe). Barcelona: ESADE-La Caixa.
Castro-González, S., Bande, B., Fernández-Ferrín, P., and Kimura, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and consumer advocacy behaviors: The importance of emotions and moral virtues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231 (10), 846-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.238
Congreso de los Diputados (Parliament of Spain) (2006). Aprobación por la Comisión de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales del Informe de la Subcomisión para potenciar y promover la responsabilidad social de las empresas. no. 424 (pp. 3-120). Madrid: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales.
Doblyté, S., Gutiérrez, R. and Pruneda, G. (2019). La protección ocupacional de nuevos riesgos sociales: conciliación y formación proporcionada por la empresa. Revista Española de Sociología, 29 (29), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.18
Ebrahim, A. H. and Buheji, M. (2020). A Pursuit for a ‘Holistic Social Responsibility Strategic Framework’ Addressing COVID-19 Pandemic Needs. American Journal of Economics, 10 (5), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20201005.04
European Commission (2001). Green Paper. Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_9, accessed 26 October 2021.
European Commission (2006). Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: Making Europe a pole of excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: Commission of the Europeans Communities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52006DC0136, accessed 26 October 2021.
Forética (2018). Informe Forética 2018 sobre la evolución de la RSE y Sostenibilidad. La recompensa del optimista. Madrid: Forética.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gallego, I. (2006). The use of economic, social and environmental indicators as a measure of sustainable development in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility Environmental Management, 3, 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.94
Global Reporting Initiative (2016). GRI Standards Download Center.
https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/resource-center/, accessed 26 October 2021
Global Reporting Initiative (2017). Linking the GRI Standards and the European Directive on non-financial and diversity disclosure. Amsterdam: GRI.
González Vega, A.M., Agudelo, D. and Méndez, S. (2019). The construction of sense and values in social ecotourism businesses. A case study in en Atarjea, El Carricillo, Guanajuato. International Journal of Organizations, 22, 181–205. https://doi.org/10.17345/rio22.181-205.
Guillén, A., and Gutiérrez, R. (2019). El bienestar complementario: la contribución de las empresas a la protección social. Madrid: Círculo Cívico de Opinión. https://www.circulocivicodeopinion.es/el-bienestar-complementario-la-contribucion-de-las-empresas-a-la-proteccion-social/, accessed 26 October 2021.
Haller, A., van Staden, Ch. J., and Landis, C. (2018). Value added as part of sustainability reporting: Reporting on distributional fairness or obfuscation? Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 763–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3338-9
Hahn, R., and Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
He, H., and Harris, L. L. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
Higgins, C., and Larrinaga, C. (2014). Sustainability reporting. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, and B. O’Dwyer, B. (eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (pp. 273-285). London: Routledge.
Jastram S. (2010). Global Reporting Initiative. In H. K. Anheier and S. Toepler (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. New York: Springer.
KPMG (2013). KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Zurich, Switzerland: KPMG.
Landrum, N. E., and Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying worldviews on corporate sustainability: a content analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 128– 151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989
Lozano, J. M. (2002). ¿Hacia la empresa ciudadana? In M. Albarello (ed.), La Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y los Códigos de Conducta: ¿beneficios para todo el mundo? (pp. 7-28). Barcelona: Fundació Pau i Solidaritat de Comissions Obreres de Catalunya.
Luque, D., and González Begega, S. (2020). El bienestar ocupacional: delimitación conceptual y variables clave de su desarrollo. Revista Española de Sociología, 29 (2), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.22325/fes/res.2020.17
Mapelli, L. (2017). The development and determinants of ‘occupational welfare’ in the recalibration of European welfare regimes: a comparative perspective. Working Paper 2WEL 1/2017. Turín: Centro Einaudi. https://www.secondowelfare.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/mapelli_2welwp_1-2017_final-3.pdf, accessed 26 October 2021.
Martínez Poza, A. (2018). Protecting occupational pensions and unemployment benefits in Spain: a weak occupational welfare system. In D. Natali, E., Pavolini, B., Vanhercke (eds.), Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities and social partner involvement (pp. 193-213). Brussels, Belgium: ETUI
Mendes, J. V., Oliveira, G. R., and De Souza, L. M. (2019). The G-Index: a sustainability reporting assessment tool. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26 (5), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1589595
Milne, M. J., and Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación (Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union, and Cooperation) (2020). Contribución de las empresas españolas al desarrollo sostenible en Iberoamérica. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, UE y Cooperación.
Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social de España (Spanish Ministry of Employment and Social Security) (2015). Estrategia española de responsabilidad social de las empresas. Madrid: Ministerio de Empleo y Seguridad Social.
Montaño, L. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility, Governance, and Institutions: Making the Pieces Fit. International Journal of Organizations, 13, 9–38. https://doi.org/10.17345/rio13.9-38
Natali, D., Keune, M., Pavolini, E., and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2018). Sixty years after Titmuss: New findings on occupational welfare in Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 52 (2), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12375
Natali, D., and Pavolini, E. (2018). Occupational Welfare in Europe: state of play, determinants, and policy implications. In D. Natali, E. Pavolini, and B. Vanhercke (eds.), Occupational Welfare in Europe: Risks, opportunities, and social partner involvement (pp. 239-257). Brussels: ETUI.
PwC (2018). Workforce of the future: The competing forces shaping 2030. https://www.pwc.com.au/pdf/workforce-of-the-future-the-competing-forces-shaping-2030.pdf, accessed 26 October 2021.
Rodríguez-Guerra, L. C., and Ríos-Osorio, L. A. (2016). Evaluación de sostenibilidad con metodología GRI. Dimensión Empresarial, 14 (2), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.15665/rde.v14i2.659
Sheth, J. (2020). Business of business is more than business: Managing during the Covid crisis. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 261-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.028
Shinwell, M., and Shamir, E. (2018). Measuring the impact of businesses on people’s well-being and sustainability: Taking stock of existing frameworks and initiatives. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2018/08. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/51837366-en
Silva, S., Nuzum, A. K., and Schaltegger, S. (2019). Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment. A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.203
Slager, R., Gond, J.-P., and Moon, J. (2012). Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies, 33 (5–6), 763–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443628
Tarquinio, L., Raucci, D., and Benedetti, R. (2018). An investigation of Global Reporting Initiative performance indicators in corporate sustainability reports: Greek, Italian and Spanish evidence. Sustainability, 10 (4), 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040897
Titmuss, R. (1958). Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.
Tschopp, D., and Nastanski, M. (2014). The harmonization and convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility reporting standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1906-9
Vigneau L., Humphreys, M., and Moon, J. (2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131:469–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2278-5
Wagner, R., and Seele, P. (2017). Uncommitted deliberation? Discussing regulatory gaps by comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a political CSR perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 146: 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3654-8
Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., and Gronhaug, K. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences. Journal of Business Research, 95: 54-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.043
Yadava, R. N., and Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 guidelines for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and private Indian companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 138:549–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2597-1
International Journal of Organizations is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms”. Therefore, everyone who sends a manuscript is explicitly accepting this publication and edition cession. In the same way, he/she is authorizing International Journal of Organizations to include his/her work in a journal’s issue for its distribution and sale. The cession allows International Journal of Organizations to publish the work in a maximum period of two years.
With the aim of favouring the diffusion of knowledge, International Journal of Organizations joins the Open Access journal movement (DOAJ), and delivers all its contents to different repositories under this protocol; therefore, sending a manuscript to the journal also entails the explicit acceptation by its author/s of this distribution method.